To: TChris
And how does referring to a vagina make the body less than a temple? That's the name for that body part. It's no different than a nose or a mouth. If the body is a temple, then the names of its body parts cannot be obscene.
49 posted on
12/16/2004 9:53:56 AM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
And how does referring to a vagina make the body less than a temple?You're right it probably doesn't, depending on the context. In the context of the V. Monologues, it's turned into a political weapon and official center of man hatred. IMO, not a terribly sacred nor respectful usage.
52 posted on
12/16/2004 10:21:14 AM PST by
TChris
(Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
To: MineralMan
And how does referring to a vagina make the body less than a temple?I think it's more in how the word is used. The a$$-hole is a part of the body too; the disrespectful uses of the word are myriad.
53 posted on
12/16/2004 10:23:12 AM PST by
TChris
(Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
To: MineralMan
>And how does referring to a
vagina make the body less than a temple?
They want to call it,
"Mary's Easy-Bake Oven" --
a more sacred phrase . . .
63 posted on
12/16/2004 1:51:10 PM PST by
theFIRMbss
(Sorry, sorry, sorry -- don't hit the abuse button, I'll never do it again . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson