Neither statement applies to the debate at hand. An individual's right to keep and bear arms is not the issue, the property owner's right to his property is what's being discussed.
I've posted the thoughts of two individual pro-Second Amendment advocates addressing this specific point, you, as it is the norm with you, can't substantiate anything with a thing beyond your own misguided opinions.
The article:
"So there are really two rights at work here. Right in property, and right of self-defense."
____________________________________
One of the most concise arguments on the current debate in Oklahoma over the right of employer to set policy regarding weapons on their property that I have found on the web.
#1 Luis
____________________________________
Luis Gonzalez wrote:
An individual's right to keep and bear arms is not the issue, the property owner's right to his property is what's being discussed.