That's what this is about. Whatever the reason...the owner actively indicated he didn't want it there...either you respect thos wishes (and his right) or you do not.
I know we are 99% in agreement on most iossues DC. I know if there was something you absolutely did not want happening on your proerty, you would be up in arms if someone drove onto your property and engaged in what you expressly said no to. It's the principle that is critical here. Either it applies or it does not. I believe it is a natural law...and it applies and cut both ways...even when we do not agree with it.
Good night (again).
You guys are all for the land owners Rights. What about the car owners Rights to his car?
Everyone I know knows that there is a standing invitation. Bring your guns. The more the merrier. It lets me know that you feel that you are willing to help me defend my property. That I am WORTH helping defend as a friend. Don't come on to my property without my invite, but once you are here I treat you as an EQUAL. Not a subservient. All of YOUR Rights as a human being will be honored and I expect no less in return.
The Principle is exactly what we are discussing here. The simple fact that you invite MY property, ie; my car, on to your property in no way gives you right to search the car for anything. Nor disapprove of anything in it as long as it is doing no direct damage to your property.
Go to sleep. We can pick this up again tomorrow if necessary.