Liberals look at communication this way because THEIR personalities function this way, and they project their pathology onto the rest of the universe.
They respond from a sub-analytical place in their soul. They are therefore very susceptible to manipulation by symbols and tactics. They are not capable of bringing analytical acumen to bear on language BEFORE they respond to it. This is why it is impossible to argue with a liberal; they don't think; they feel.
Even the bright among them. The smart liberals use their brains differently than you and I. The function of their brains is to wrap a pre-analytical response in a protective coating of justification. First, the feeling, then, the argument to support it. So it isn't a question of who is smart and who is dumb; no, the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the SEQUENCE in which the faculties engage.
So when they look for the magic phrase, the magic symbol, they are just assuming that the entire electorate is like them.
The liberal is a person with a subconscious. The more conservative is your temperament, the less a subconscious you have. Literally. So when you're a Peggy Noonan and some leftist academic asks you about rummaging around in voters' subconscious, you have no idea what she is talking about.
My number one saying and very true!
They respond from a sub-analytical place in their soul. They are therefore very susceptible to manipulation by symbols and tactics. They are not capable of bringing analytical acumen to bear on language BEFORE they respond to it. This is why it is impossible to argue with a liberal; they don't think; they feel.
Even the bright among them. The smart liberals use their brains differently than you and I. The function of their brains is to wrap a pre-analytical response in a protective coating of justification. First, the feeling, then, the argument to support it. So it isn't a question of who is smart and who is dumb; no, the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the SEQUENCE in which the faculties engage. So when they look for the magic phrase, the magic symbol, they are just assuming that the entire electorate is like them. "
Oh, that's good Tal. Can I use it as my tagline? Will it fit? Very well said.
Not sure I agree. The difference is really the willingness of the conservative to ask the second question. Not just,"Wouldn't it be great if the story of the moment making me feel bad could be cured by some great protector?",but"What would be the effects of the various possibilities for ameliorating this situation?"