If they think Pat is of any importance, they should attack him directly.
I'm sure you wouldn't like it if you were smeared by linking you to someone who subsequently did something horrible.
It is the tactic I despise, not the facts. It is cowardly way to go after somebody on their part. Again, they should go right after him directly if they really feel that strongly. Then, PB can sue them if it isn't true.
I notice you chose to ignore SJackson's proof of Pat's past Holocaust denial.