The NY Times is publishing DNC talking points, again. Looks like Gonzales is target #2, following Kerik.
1 posted on
12/15/2004 10:55:45 PM PST by
nj26
To: nj26
"... asserting that Mr. Gonzales's supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment."
Unfortunately, they might have a point on this one. From what I understand of Gonzalez, he believes the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of what is Constitutional and what isn't--he approved detainee treatment methods with the mindset that only the Supreme Court can determine what is Constitutional and what isn't. This may be the reason why Bush supported McCain-Feingold: Gonzalez told him it was okay because the Court is supposed to decide Constitutionality.
I hope I'm wrong, though.
2 posted on
12/15/2004 10:59:45 PM PST by
Terpfen
(Gore/Sharpton '08: it's Al-right!)
To: nj26
Look at this, they first say:
"He went forum-shopping," General Cullen said, saying Mr. Gonzales had ignored the advice of military lawyers adamantly opposed to some of the legal strategies adopted, including narrowly defining torture so as to make it difficult to prove it occurred.
They then say:
The memorandums produced largely by lawyers in the Justice Department and other government agencies created great bitterness at the time among military lawyers, who said they were not consulted.
The Republicans need to stand up and get the President's nominations affirmed. They have the perfect opportunity to make positive changes and if they allow the Democrats and their whining prevent that, they'll have committed the unforgivable.
3 posted on
12/15/2004 11:07:02 PM PST by
Jaysun
(I'm pleased to report that Arafat's condition remains stable.)
To: nj26
Rear Adm. John D. Hutson, who served as the Navy's judge advocate general from 1997 to 2000 before he retired, Hmmmmm .. That would be under the Clinton Administration right????
4 posted on
12/15/2004 11:17:14 PM PST by
Mo1
(Should be called Oil for Fraud and not Oil for Food)
To: nj26
I get the distinct impression that, before they are retired military officers, Admiral Hutson and General Cullen are Democrats.
5 posted on
12/15/2004 11:21:12 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: nj26
Thanks for zeroing in on the "Key Fact". Too many seem to see this as a "all skaters skate" call to micro-criticize every decision the Prez intends to make. Suffering through that sort of exercise is gruesome.
6 posted on
12/15/2004 11:25:34 PM PST by
CBart95
To: nj26
""was not thinking about the impact of his behavior on U.S. troops in this war and others to come." "Our enemies cut off heads already. Gonzales was right in giving more weight to preventing another three thousand Americans from been burned alive in another 9/11.
7 posted on
12/15/2004 11:28:41 PM PST by
bayourod
(Our troops are already securing our borders against terrorists. They're killing them in Iraq.)
To: nj26
According to television news last night, Gonzales is the one who "vetted" Kerik.
11 posted on
12/16/2004 5:46:07 PM PST by
JustAnotherSavage
("As frightening as terrorism is, it's the weapon of losers." P.J. O'Rourke)
To: nj26
Gee, just what was it that Shakespeare said about lawyers. Hmmm, what was that? :)
To: nj26
Gonzales is pro-abortion. Why is anyone at FR defending someone who has the blood of innocent children on his hands?
14 posted on
01/03/2005 4:55:55 AM PST by
derheimwill
(Love is a person, not an emotion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson