You don't like UC Davis? Okay, fine, pick your own expert -- as long as it is mainstream and not from a Christian thinktank.
If you can't find ONE mainstream source to back up your point of view, then I will continue to regard UC Davis as a reasonable source.
Mainstream is a morally relative term -really meaningless regarding truth... Homosexuality is a disordered condition; therefore, homosexuality is disordered as are homosexuals, homosexual 'parents', homosexual researchers, etcetera -
If the 'mainstream' are pro-homosexual; [they] too are disordered...
Support of disordered agenda is also disordered... The homosexual agenda is supported by disordered individuals with disordered supporting research contrived by disordered individuals...
Hetty, what homo-sexual person with preferences for young children would submit to a study, let alone one that would not give them preferential treatment (like they can expect at UCDavis)?
Heck, what similarly-minded hetero- would?
The only fair and rational study is to look at those convicted, and the gender of their victim/s. When you look at those numbers, you get a far different picture. This way you avoid the premeditated tainting of a study.
Again, I have to ask: How can anyone look at a report of a male adult molesting a male child (or female/female) and not call it a homosexual act? And if that adult is committing a homosexual act, then how can you avoid labeling them as homosexual (or at least bi-sexual)?