Jimmy Carter and the Dark Side - (Exposes Carter)

GREG LEWIS.ORG ^ | AUGUST 26, 2003 | GREG LEWIS

[Pan_Yans Wife]

ping

[b4its2late]

BTTT for a read tomorrow. Too tired tonight....

[xJones]

Carter is a small, very small man. He is petty and vindicative in an impotent way. He never could get over Reagan trouncing him in 1980 and kicking him back home to his peanut farm.

If you take a look at the whole Carter family, you'll see why even liberal pundits said they couldn't make this kind of stuff up.

[Anti-Bubba182]

No matter how strong a case can be made against Carter and his policies, he is incapable of admitting his mistakes. It is a hallmark of the powerful that when they err they immediately
turn to apologetics.

[JackSplatt]

Great analysis of that p-nutty loser.

[stevem]

Where Carter is concerned, the fact that his efforts at international statesmanship appear to come from a well-meaning...

I guess I don't comprehend "well meaning" in this case. Carter works SO hard to validate raping murdering butchers that I doubt anyone can call it well meaning.

The point is that Carter, while he would (presumably) never consciously imperil the cause of democracy or the interests of the United States

This is a quality I would NEVER ascribe to Carter. Any man with such a stage that can't get out in public fast enough to validate raping murderers while he continuously tries to undermine the man and men trying to defend this country would happily take the US down to ever lower levels. Carter is, pure and simple, a bad man.

[Technical Editor]

Did anyone catch him on Charlie Rose the other day? Carter gave one answer about who owns Iraqi oil that floored me. Said he didn't know who owned it and brushed off the question. Charlie had to "correct" him after Carter said something really stupid. Charlie then cleared up all question that Carter's a totally scripted puppet for God knows who or what. He has no clue about anything and talks for 15 minutes saying nothing coherent.

[FreeKeys]

Excellent overview. For those who would like a more in-depth study:

The man who paved  the way for Iran's  ayatollahs,  Venezuela's Chavez and North Korea's nuclear program

[stevem]

Oh, and Carter is also a narcissist. He isn't such in the sense of clinton whose entire universe runs from his own belly button to his own knees. No, Carter's only reason to live is to have others tell him what a fine man he is. People like that are sickening.

[speekinout]

Good analysis of Carter. And the references to Clinton are apt, as well.

So glad we are rid of them! Yes, they are still meddling, but Bush isn't paying any more than ceremonial attention.

[Cowboy Bob]

One of the worst things about Clinton being elected President was that it allowed "Peanut Boy" to come back into the public eye.

[185JHP]

It was said of him "back then" that "he's mean but not tough!" I remember my revulsion when he tried to cut GI Bill stipends. He is a vile person...

[Theresawithanh]

I remember well carter being elected. My roommate at the time voted for him, because that's who daddy voted for, and I had the absolute worst toothache of my life that night, and couldn't get to a dentist until the next morning. I was really disappointed that he'd won.

I also knew several guys serving in the military who voted for him, because he was going to make sure they got a raise in their pay, or some such BS.

The worst president in my lifetime, and right on his heels was clinton.

[CHARLITE]

Jummuh Cah-duh would show up at the opening of an envelope if it would give him face time.........and he'd drag Michael Moron along with him as a validator that he really is a "champion of the blue collar working class."

[Darkwolf377]

His reputation among Americans is not what the MSM would have you think. At most, even my liberal friends think he was a nice loser.

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

It is a hallmark of the powerful that when they err they immediately turn to apologetics.

I'm assuming that you mean "explanations." If this is the case, I would state that it is more the trait of the arrogant, powerful or not.

[pennyfarmer]

Carter, true to the form that would come to characterize his diplomatic forays, took the side of the real human-rights monster, in this case Khomeini, when faced with a choice.

Carter should have had a campfire and made some SMORES hell that always makes be want to cooperate. He is some kinda freaking genius. Let the Bastards take hostages then negotiate to show how much compassion he has wow if I was gay I would (*(*** him. Sorry but vulgarity is the only way to show real respect for the turd.

[ken21]

in ca'ta's 2nd administration he was going to give back the u.s. to indians. (/s)

[spinestein]

The assumption that Jimmy Carter was an incompetent fool as president is inaccurate. He very competently enacted the policies of the Democratic party, both foreign and domestic, from 1977 through 1980. The United States saw an economic policy of increasing regulation of business, an increasingly progressive tax code, a federal budget increasing much faster than the real rate of growth of the economy, and a foreign policy that consisted of talking about the future goal of peace.

All of these policies were implemented in a competent manner by President Carter and the results are exactly in line with the predictions made by supply-side economists and "national defense" minded Americans, and in direct contradiction to the results predicted by Democrats. It can be predicted that any future politician who advocates these same polices (no matter how competent they are) will achieve the same disastrous results.