To: Ed Current
Thanks for posting. I learned as much in law school, but most non-lawyers (and, indeed, most lawyers) still believe that the federal courts are the sole arbiters of constitutional interpretation.
5 posted on
12/14/2004 3:40:23 PM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
From a pragmatist's point of view, they are.
From a Constitutionalist's point of view, they should have been impeached back around the time the first Bank of the United States was held Constitutional.
18 posted on
12/14/2004 4:06:56 PM PST by
LibertarianInExile
(NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson