Replies

Whether I have a basic misunderstanding of how science works, or whether something proves or disproves a theory is not relevant. What TOE's need to understand is that in order for their theory to work, the world needs to be as it is. Therefore the first 4 evolutions must occur exactly the precise way needed to create the environment for evolution. I don't need to have a scientific background to hold the belief that God created the universe and all life.

All the scientitic terminology and alleged "proof" and "dispositive evidence" will carry a shadow of doubt as no one can go back in time to see what happened. You can say the same thing about Creationism. Both need a leap of faith to believe in and both are forms of religious belief.

If it makes you feel better to assume your correct no matter what, then have at it. If it makes you feel better to condescend and be intolerant of others, then have at it. It is my experience that evolutionists believe that if it feels good, its right, so I am not surprised by your reaction.

Therefore the first 4 evolutions must occur exactly the precise way needed to create the environment for evolution.

Those four processes are not evolution. And, those theories could be completely wrong and that would still not disprove the TOE. Even if aliens or Zeus created the universe and the first lifeform, evolution would still be the mechanism by which all other species came about from that life form.

It is my experience that evolutionists believe that if it feels good, its right, so I am not surprised by your reaction

What is the point of this statement?

Whether I have a basic misunderstanding of how science works, or whether something proves or disproves a theory is not relevant.

It's not relevant whether your understanding of science is faulty? Your argument is built around your understanding of science. If your understanding is shown to be faulty, then the entire credibility of your argument falls into question.

What TOE's need to understand is that in order for their theory to work, the world needs to be as it is.

What a fascinating tautology. The world is as it is.

Therefore the first 4 evolutions must occur exactly the precise way needed to create the environment for evolution.

No, they don't! If you disagree, then explain how biological evolution fails if our current understanding of stellar formation is falisifed. This should be easy to do if you're right. Show how evolution is falsified if it is determined that the leading abiogenesis hypothesis is proven incorrect. Show how evolution is falsified if the Big Bang is shown to be impossible. Show the evidence for the connections that you are asserting and we won't have a basis for calling you fundamentally ignorant on the matter.