Posted on 12/14/2004 5:18:20 AM PST by ricks_place
The left - anything to be counter-productive!
Hopefully the Inaug. Ball will be a grand one---and NO LIBS INVITED!!!!!!
Just a cry in the night. We lost: Please dont rub it in by holding a party.. Whiners and crybabies.
Show of hands: anyone believe that the stated reason for this suggestion is the real reason?
Anybody?
No?
Me, neither.
Dan
Had Kerry won......?
The preservation of America, and its traditions, is what these brave young men and women are fighting for, but we can't expect the left to understand that.
We hardly got to celebrate his election the first time and now they want us to "sacrifice" celebrating the second time.
I am deeply offended.
Well duh! Everyone know Franklin didn't like to dance. ;~))
Interesting that the 'Rats never suggested that Clinton cancel any of his parties. Were there no troops stationed overseas during that time? What, did all the homeless automatically find decent housing the second Clinton became President? Oh, that's right, I forgot, they did, there was no problem with homelessness during the Clinton regime. That's only a problem during Republican administrations, since they cause it (/sarcasm).
Rush is so right about these people.
Somehow, I don't think our soldiers, sailor, airmen and Marines will begrudge the President his Inaugural Balls. Only petty, spiteful liberals who are still pi$$ed that their guy couldn't muster the votes want them cancelled.
I hate it when non-Americans like the Democrats meddle in our domestic affairs. The United Nations building should be converted into the new Ellis Island with the traitor Slick Willie as the manager. This time it will be to Europe and not from it. AAAALLLLLL ABOARD!
Good point.
Had Kerry won, these same people would be calling for a major ball, perhaps the biggest in history. They would be saying how we "truly have something to celebrate with the new Kerry presidency!" and how the triumph of the political will of the American people is always a matter for celebration.
One is want to think that the "tragedy" they believe should prevent President Bush from holding a major ball is his own reelection.
I hope it is a grand affair.
If we stop balling, the terrorists win!
The Old Guy's gonna get you for that. 8^)
Franklin Pierce declined to celebrate while mourning the fresh loss of his son in 1853. Franklin D. Roosevelt skipped them during the Depression and World War II.
Numerous or two?
If a Dem were in power, the Perspirer would never have coughed up this hairball. Once again, transparent partisanship masquerades as "principle" among the liberals.
A far more important "gesture" would be the left laying off criticizing a sitting President's foreign policy at a time of war. But with today's slimy leftist weasels, there's no way that would happen.
Gee, what SORE LOSERS they are! At least WE don't jump up and down on the bed in the Lincoln bedroom when we win.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.