Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rell Wants To Fund Stem Cell Research
Hartford Courant ^ | December 14, 2004 | CHRISTOPHER KEATING

Posted on 12/14/2004 3:42:12 AM PST by kidd

Gov. M. Jodi Rell stepped into a controversial issue Monday, saying the state should spend $10 million to $20 million on stem cell research.

"I believe very much in stem cell research," Rell told reporters at the state Capitol complex. "I believe that some seed money would be appropriate."

Rell intends to set aside money from this year's state budget surplus, but the funding probably would be a one-time grant because Rell is projecting difficult times and a deficit in the next fiscal year of as much as $1.3 billion.

"We're certainly not a California," Rell said. "We can't go out to the billion-dollar mark. But if we can do something and hopefully garner some matching funds, I think it frankly would be a prudent use of a one-time revenue deposit, if you will, from our state surplus. But we're in the very preliminary stages of that."

(Excerpt) Read more at ctnow.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: mjodirell; rino; stemcell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To read full article use:

Member name = Niner11

Password = 911911

=================

FYI - The article really muddies the issue. It doesn't make it clear whether this is embryonic stem cell research or not. Ray Dunaway on WTIC 1080 radio implied that this IS for embryonic stem cell research.

The article seems to suggest that one state Democrat wants this research on existing lines of embryonic stem cells, but again, the article is not that clear. Naturally, the Democrat who is quoted thinks that even more money should be spent.

Connecticut is over 50% Catholic. This aspect is considered in the article.

====================

My two cents:

Even if this is existing lines of embryonic stem cells, someone was killed to provide them.

Connecticut has one of the highest tax rates in the country. This is MY money that this RINO wants to spend. Its not a SURPLUS, its OVERTAXATION. Let the free market dictate where research money should be spent.

1 posted on 12/14/2004 3:42:13 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kidd

At a time when we are facing a deficit next year, I say if they want this research then Teresa Heinz, George Soros, Bill Gates and other billionaires should pay for it. $20 million is mere pocket change to them.


2 posted on 12/14/2004 3:54:02 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Would this ol'gal be willing to volunteer her own quite ample supply of stem cells to science ~ like maybe this week?

Shortly it is going to be possible to flense any adult, process out their stem cells, and use them for research or various applications. When that happens, the debate over the use of embryonic stem cells is going to look "childish" ~ after all, some adults obviously have really good stem cells of great benefit to all mankind, and it's probably our right to go in there and take them, eh?!

3 posted on 12/14/2004 4:35:07 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; JohnnyZ

"Gov. M. Jodi Rell stepped into a controversial issue Monday, saying the state should spend $10 million to $20 million on stem cell research."



Cripes, and I was holding out hope that Rell wasn't a full-on RINO. It's one thing if she's pro-abort and does not oppose embryonic-stem-cell research, but to call for public financing is just insane.

And she's the one who will get to pick Lieberman's replacement if President Bush names him as Secretary of DHS? We'd be lucky to get Chris Shays as the two-year Senator.


4 posted on 12/14/2004 8:34:50 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

=shakes head=

Well, it's not like we have any Conservatives in the CT delegation, anyhow (at least none since the pre-Gubernatorial John Rowland... *sigh*).


5 posted on 12/14/2004 12:44:48 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

"Well, it's not like we have any Conservatives in the CT delegation, anyhow"



True, but I twas holding out hope that maybe Rell could name a conservative state senator, or ex-Congressman Gary Franks, or *somebody* half-decent.


6 posted on 12/14/2004 1:58:20 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Franks couldn't even hold his own seat, and, alas, he was also pro-abort. :-(


7 posted on 12/14/2004 2:32:16 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

"Franks couldn't even hold his own seat, and, alas, he was also pro-abort. :-("



True, but compared to Shays, Johnson and Simmons, he was Jesse Helms.

As for "not holding his seat," that is putting it mildly, since he represented what was by far the most Republican CD in the state, and lost badly to James Maloney (ironically, a pro-life Democrat) in 1996, and then Franks went on to lose in a humiliating fashion against Chris Dodd in the 1998 Senate election. But since there is no clear frontrunner for the GOP for the 2006 Senate race, I thought that perhaps Rell could name Franks as a placeholder until 2006, which would at least allow us to have a black Senator for a couple of years. In 2006, the CT GOP could hold a primary without having someone who was annointed by the governor, which is usually for the best (although if Franks ended up being a popular Senator, he might run in the primary anyhow).


8 posted on 12/14/2004 2:40:39 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I just think Franks had his shot and he blew it badly. I doubt he'd accept the appointment only just to serve as a seat-warmer (which I wouldn't necessarily object to). He'd likely be just as ignored as he was during his 3 terms in the House (as far as the media was concerned, there's only been one Black Republican ever, and that was J.C.), unlike incoming Barack Hussein Obama (his full name must ALWAYS be said now). Probably better to let Rell put Shays in the job and call a special election for the seat, which would likely go to State Sen. John McKinney (Stewart's son). I personally think Shays may be one election away from defeat and might be better for some new blood in there before we lose it to the 'Rats.


9 posted on 12/14/2004 3:08:16 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

"Barack Hussein Obama (his full name must ALWAYS be said now)."



I thought you were kidding, but then I Googled the full name, and you're right: His last name rhymes with Osama, his first name rhymes with Iraq, and his middle name is the same as Saddam's surname!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Barack+Hussein+Obama%22

Gee, I wonder why he hid this from the voters.

What was the name that Obama used while growing up in Hawaii and when he went to college? You know, before he "rediscovered" his Kenyan heritage, which his deadbeat dad didn't do much to instill in him?


"Probably better to let Rell put Shays in the job and call a special election for the seat, which would likely go to State Sen. John McKinney (Stewart's son)."


Chris Shays is so annoying that I would rather see anyone else be named to the Senate. I had suggested Shays as a Senate candidate against Dodd only because (i) Dodd would be nearly impossible to defeat by any Republican, and maybe a RINO like Shays could catch lightning and beat him, and (ii) in the likely event that Shays loses, it would get him out of Congress and allow a better Republican to win the seat.

As for McKinney, he appears to be a RINO, although he couldn't possibly be worse than Chris Shays. Do you really think McKinney would be favored in a general election in the district? Here's McKinney's bio: http://www.senatereps.state.ct.us/senainfo/McKinney.htm


10 posted on 12/14/2004 3:35:42 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Yeah, when I heard his middle name, I thought it was a joke, too, until I researched it and discovered it was correct. I don't know what name he used in Hawaii, perhaps he used "Al" or "Don H." Obama... ;-)

I'm no fan of Shays, either (though certainly he isn't as bad as "Missing" Linc Chafee), but the farm team in CT is very very slim (we were far better off a decade ago there). As for John McKinney, I would think he'd likely be a good fit for the district (he does serve in the State Senate leadership, but as it stands, he isn't going to be serving in a Senate majority anytime soon), and Stew McKinney was revered in that seat. I don't know how liberal McKinney is, but pop was quite RINOish. Shays is the safest bet of the 3 CT Congressmembers whose seat we could retain (if Rell appoints Nancy Johnson, Jim Maloney could make a comeback -- if she appoints Rob Simmons, that seat will revert to the 'Rats). It's all but a given that 'Rat Attorney-General Richard Blumenthal will run for the seat if and when it comes open, and he will be a very tough opponent to defeat (it was, after all, the job Lieberman held when he took down the horrid then-Sen. Lowell Weicker in '88), so if we can't hold it with Shays, we can't hold it with anyone.


11 posted on 12/14/2004 4:08:34 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Rally Cry In '05: No Justices - No PEACE !*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican
Yuck. Many state officials are publicly promoting stem cell. Gov. Jim Doyle of WI, IL Comptroller Dan Hynes, and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson have made recent announcements to push for govt funding of stem cell research. I guess the biotech industry has a ton of money to spend on lobbying.
12 posted on 12/14/2004 6:57:21 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

[It's one thing if she's pro-abort and does not oppose embryonic-stem-cell research, but to call for public financing is just insane.]

I laugh every time of hear someone who claims he/she is a fiscal conservative, but socially liberal. I found that the more pro-abort an individual is, the more socialist he/she is. After all, Lincoln Cafee, George Pataki, Susan Collins are not fiscal conservatives.

BTW, I live in the IL-13, which is RINO heartland. Illinois politics has become depressing. Recently, Indiana is looking like an attractive place to live.


13 posted on 12/14/2004 7:05:32 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

14 posted on 12/14/2004 9:44:28 PM PST by nutmeg ("Let the UN investigate itself." - Juan Williams (Fox News) 12/10/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I wish I could hear Tom Scott on this thread. Hey I did it!


15 posted on 12/15/2004 6:31:43 AM PST by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

I wish I could hear Tom Scott suggested on this thread.


16 posted on 12/15/2004 6:34:28 AM PST by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

"I wish I could hear Tom Scott on this thread."



I assume Tom Scott would be your preferred choice if Rell got to name Lieberman's replacement. I'm not familiar with him; what can you tell me about Tom Scott? Is he a current officeholder or would he be new blood?


17 posted on 12/15/2004 6:48:30 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Article re: another freeper where Tom Scott is mentioned

On December 2, 2000, I held a rally in New Haven in front of then Vice Presidential candidate Joe Lieberman's house, doing what little I could to show support for the newly elected President Bush, and to show my frustration at the Democrats in their attempts to overturn the genuinely won election by George W. Bush.

At the end of the rally, Former Ct State Senator Tom Scott was speaking on the back of my truck, when all of a sudden the lead Democrat supporter of the counter rally held at the same location, started to approach my truck, then turned and took 3 or 4 running steps and jumped on the bed of my truck in a manner that I thought he was going to attack someone on the truck: either me or Tom.

I stepped to his side and held out my arm to stop him as he ran into my arm and immediately stopped his forward motion.

I kept my hand held out in front of him to prevent him from going forward on the truck bed and get closer to Tom who was speaking at the time.

After 3 seconds or so, the man who jumped on my truck immediately turned and jumped down off the truck into the arms of the Police who quickly escorted him away from my truck.

The whole incident lasted no more than 5 seconds it seems.

Tom and I decided to not press charges for assault or trespass on my truck, and let him go.

9 months later, the man filed suit against me for assault.

I am not joking.

9 months later.

He claims I grabbed his throat.

Look at the picture. This picture was taken December 2, 2000.

That is the man who claims I was grabbing his throat. My hand is on his chest, not his throat. My hand was NEVER on his throat, nor was it ever near his throat!


18 posted on 12/15/2004 7:46:37 AM PST by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Rell will be hearing from my family.


19 posted on 12/15/2004 5:40:00 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
saying the state should spend $10 million to $20 million on stem cell research.

Heck that is chump change. My state is spending 3 billion. You are getting off dirt cheap.

20 posted on 12/15/2004 5:50:34 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson