To: Clint N. Suhks; little jeremiah; MAWG
" MAWG is very defensive about his brother's disorder. I guess it's a natural reaction to defend ones family even in light of it's inherent dysfunction
.MAWG takes entirely the wrong attitude of accepting it as a legitimate alternative to that which is good, right and true and relies on anecdotal evidence to prove other wise. She lashes out because she must know deep down her opinion is flawed and lacks validity in any sense of real science" I think anyone who pulls something as presumptuous, ignorant and insulting as this out of the blue is the one with some kind of emotional problem.
What did you do to help your brother turn away from his perversion? Nothing? I suggest you were either too lazy or too indifferent to help him (posty #114).....
If someone said that about me and my relationship with a disabled or disturbed sibling knowing as little as you about the specifics of our relationship and age, defensive would be the nicest you thing you could say about my reaction.
158 posted on
12/13/2004 3:12:26 PM PST by
elfman2
To: elfman2
Oh elfman, don't you have some erroneous homosexual research to pedal? Your indignation given your credibility with "research studies" is a bit under whelming I'm afraid. Sorry, not interested.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson