> The fossil evidence is very difficult to reconcile with the Darwinist scenario.
Sure, if your goal requires you to ignore irritating little things like facts and evidence.
I agree this book seems a bit biased, not to mention a pretty concise agenda hidden in it. Darwinian evolution has been refined over the years. Basically all this does is debunk Darwinian evolution, not evolution itself. There are other theories (punctuated equilibrium for example) that deal with some of the holes in Darwinian evolution. I really despise books and articles that intentionally try to con the uninformed. They aren't saying anything that is not true, however they leave a great deal out that contradicts their views. Hardly unbiased work.