[ken5050]

If you're going after Hilary, and by extension, BIll, the Feds have to have it nailed down cold..hard evidence..corroborated testimony..the whole enchilada, otherwise it will be dismissed as a "political witchhunt"..The good guys know this..athey also operate on the assumption that Hillary doesn't know exactly what they have as yet..If she decides NOT to run..either in 06 or 08..then we can connect the dots...alo look for someone high in the UN to cut a deal..

[mewzilla]

Don't the folks in the UN have diplomatic immunity? If so, they're untouchable. Which means the feds will have to go after businessmen, bureaucrats, and/or pols. Fine by me, though. Anyone who was in on this ought to be doing time right next to Saddamn.

[Liz]

.....the Feds have to have it nailed down cold.....hard evidence..corroborated testimony.....

....something on the order of say having a "blue dress"? (/sarc)

Lookit, the evidence is there, it's just that the bar to obtain justice has been raised so high, even videoed and audioed crimes in progress is not enough.

You got enough money, and cagey lawyers, you can buy "experts," and introduce anything in a court of law as exculpatory evidence.

[Searching4Justice]

This explains why the US never went after AQ or anyone else after the WTC bombing and other terrorist events. These guys (Clintoon and his buddies) were on the take so any attempt to disrupt this cash flow would have worked against their own interests. No need for prolonged trials back then, if someone got in their way there would be a plane crash or suicide to clear the way for this crap to continue. It would be more of the same with Chillary.