Posted on 12/12/2004 10:09:14 PM PST by FBD
This happened in the Clinton-Reno-Freeh regime. There's
no telling what happened.
Do you think Timothy McVeigh acted alone in the Oklahoma City Bombing?
Yes
5%
No
95%
Very badly worded. He did have help from at least one other person – Terry Nichols. I do believe there were more involved, and that some evidence was covered up by some law enforcement agency.
Terry Nichols was in the Philippines when Ramzi Yousef was there.
Nichols and McVeigh (per Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, The Secret Life of Bill Clinton, Regnery, 1997) could not get their ANFO act together without Dennis Mahon the FBI informant's assistance.
Per above, McVeigh reconnoitered with Andreas Karl Strassmeier, German trained in military intelligence who left America unscathed.
On the other hand, Bill Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh.
Uh, no.
No, sorry. I only became interested after 911, even though I knew there was something to it beforehand. Try Backhoe.
MANY MANY FReepers were in on the discussions. And THEY made MORE sense/presented the case MORE convincingly than the gov't/gov't 'experts'/and the lamestream.
When things don't add up or make sense or have WAY too many holes, FReepers have a favorite saying....It doesn't pass the smell test. And OKC STINKS to high Heaven!!!
It irritates me no end when idiots say 'what did Bush know and when did he know it?' The MORE important question SHOULD be...'what did klintler know and when did he know it and WHAT DID HE DO ABOUT IT????'
Perhaps, if THAT question were asked, answered, and ACTED UPON, 9/11 'could' have been avoided.
I'm not familiar with how Ashcroft paid lip-service to McVeigh's death sentence. Can you post a link or an 'article'?
In the History Channel documentary, someone told of one of the captured terrorists drawing a picture of McVeigh...or am I mistaken and it was Nichols?
The History channel program didn't mention Jayna Davis' work, and that was disappointing.
I didn't know James Woolsey had said that about Jayna Davis.
I'm not that informed on this subject; people like you on this thread have really helped to bring me up to speed.
Thanks
No 94%
Total Votes: 295
I think we are the only ones voting
I agree, that TWA explosion just doesn't add up.
As in OKC, there are some things that don't add up, but I don't attribute the conspiracy to sinister govt. plots: I chalk it up to laziness, ineptitude, and cowardice.
If they (govt intel) look into these things, it means they might have to confront foreign govts, go to war, take action. Much simpler to avoid a thorough investigation.
So in a sense it is a coverup...of avoidance.
Regards
thanks for that ping Meek. it's an old subject, but given our WOT, I think it has current relevance. Most people who've read up on OKC seem to believe that there was an Islamic terrorist/ state connection. I do anyway! ;)
regards
OKC ping -- relates to today's conversation about Clinton & the 9/11 Commission's lame "Final Report".
>Personally I think that McVeigh and Nichols had help from several radical groups. Especially the Muslim group in the Philippines.
I also believe that Bill Clinton did nothing because it would have required the USA to take an action that many in the Dimoratic party would not support.< ----OKIEDOC
The gov't had agents there in unmarked black cars, throwing strange hula hoop like objects across the highways when a vehicle crossed. They were in the close vicinty of the Murrah Building. Eyewitness report this on the night before the "bombing". Bomb squads were out the morning of the bombing, prior to. All according to eyewitness reports, newspaper reports and Charles Keys book. Now how bad would it of looked if Bill Clinton did do something but missed it "accidently" or on purpose. Maybe, oh I don't know, to push through gun control legislation. Something the dimwitted oh I mena the Dimoratic party was pushing through at the time. Muslim groups were in large numbers at the time, doing unreported things and still are.
Witnesses heard multiple explosions: Experts say Murrah damage not done by truck blast alone
Thanks for the "PING"!!
This info needs to have more light shed on it and hopefully the History Channel show is but a start...a start to end the Clinton's quest of eight more years!!!
Freepers info is the best...the ties between the Iraqi's and the WTC1, OKC, 911 have been well shown here!!
why is that info stored at a left wing hemp-pushing kook site? (www.whatreallyhappened.com)
These wackos think Bush stole the election, etc.
And lo and behold the BATF knew enough to stay away that day--what are the odds?
Re Ashcroft's "lip service":
Found this on Google:
http://www.s-t.com/daily/05-01/05-13-01/a01wn008.htm
Inquiring minds want to know.
>"Look at the documents for their context. If they are genuine (which they appear to be)..."<
-No happy, all the type fonts remind me of the Dan Rather story. Seriously.
>"...would you still discredit them just because of where they happen to reside on the web?"<
-If a story comes from questioanable sources, be it Dan Rather, or some left-wing kook site that says Bush stole the election, etc, than yes, I will question the source, and it's documents.
Does Jayne Davis have these documents in her book?
Inquiring minds want to know! ;^D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.