Skip to comments.
Too much talk lets out US spy secret [Senator Rockefeller blabs]
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^
| December 13, 2004
| By David Rennie
Posted on 12/12/2004 7:03:51 PM PST by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
12/12/2004 7:03:51 PM PST
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
2
posted on
12/12/2004 7:05:16 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(In for a penny, in for a pound, saddlin' up and Baghdad-bound!)
To: aculeus
Why don't we have enforce the law on those who break it? This is outrageous.
3
posted on
12/12/2004 7:06:27 PM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists and international criminals than they ever captured or killed)
To: aculeus
4
posted on
12/12/2004 7:07:06 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(W stands for Winner)
To: aculeus
Okay--so who told David Rennie, the author of this article?
If what Rockefeller said was vetted, then who DID spill the beans?
5
posted on
12/12/2004 7:12:24 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Proud to be a Texan)
To: aculeus
How does this SOB get to be Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence? I wouldn't trust him with a secret recipe for potato salad.
6
posted on
12/12/2004 7:13:17 PM PST
by
nuconvert
(Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
To: Old Sarge
Make that two of us who despise this idiot!! This is the second time this SOB has tried to undermine the security of our Government i 2 years Remember the "intelligence committee" debacle? We all know it was big ass Jay!
7
posted on
12/12/2004 7:15:06 PM PST
by
acapesket
(never had a vote count in all my years here)
To: Old Sarge
Imagine if their talking horse candidate had gotten into the White House.
8
posted on
12/12/2004 7:20:49 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Why can't you be like Endicott?)
To: Perdogg
9
posted on
12/12/2004 7:23:16 PM PST
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
Jay Rockefeller is an Embarrassment to our country and to the senate of the USA.The senate should make this ass sit in the corner with a dunce cap on.
10
posted on
12/12/2004 7:23:52 PM PST
by
solo gringo
(Liberal democrats are swamp leaches)
To: aculeus
Conservatives denounced Mr Rockefeller for allegedly giving away a state secret, but he insisted that his remarks had been vetted by intelligence officials beforehand. Vetted by whom? The guys Bush is in the process of firing?
11
posted on
12/12/2004 7:23:55 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Nil illegitemus carborundum est)
To: aculeus
If it was classified, he should be prosecuted.
To: aculeus
Why has noone prosecuted Rockefeller (or Senator Depends, meaning Leahy) for leaking intel secrets?
13
posted on
12/12/2004 7:25:47 PM PST
by
Bombardier
(What part of "Shall not be infringed" is unclear, you liberal moron?)
To: Txsleuth
Mr. Rennie must read the Washington Post. Just about every detail in this story was reported in yesterday's Post.
14
posted on
12/12/2004 7:26:41 PM PST
by
ironman
To: aculeus
I would like to know how many billions we've spent on this already, and why some idiot Senator made them moot by giving away national secrets.
I would also like to know why he hasn't been arrested and charged with treason.
To: aculeus
Rockefeller and Berger should both be charged, tried, convicted and sent away to serve long prison sentences. If we don't draw a line in the sand, our entire security system will be compromised.
To: acapesket
This is the second time this SOB has tried to undermine the security of our Government i 2 years Remember the "intelligence committee" debacle? The second time THAT WE KNOW OF!
17
posted on
12/12/2004 7:28:27 PM PST
by
alnick
To: Ben Hecks
And the 'Rats wonder why they aren't trusted on matters of national security...
18
posted on
12/12/2004 7:32:35 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Bombardier
Can someone confirm this. I heard that Congressmen couldn't be prosecuted for releasing classified information, and that legally, none of them needed security clearances (though each house requires clearances for the Members having access to classified information).
I have no idea if this is correct, but it would make sense. The peoples' Representatives should have access to classified information, and the ability to alert the public of classified information that they think needs to be known. That would be consistent with the idea that it's our government, and Congress watches out for us, and if Congress wants to restrict how they get information, that's their business.
19
posted on
12/12/2004 7:40:36 PM PST
by
NYFriend
To: NYFriend
Can someone confirm this. I heard that Congressmen couldn't be prosecuted for releasing classified information, and that legally, none of them needed security clearances (though each house requires clearances for the Members having access to classified information). I have no idea if this is correct, but it would make sense. The peoples' Representatives should have access to classified information, and the ability to alert the public of classified information that they think needs to be known. That would be consistent with the idea that it's our government, and Congress watches out for us, and if Congress wants to restrict how they get information, that's their business.Excuse me???
If I read you right - that would mean no security at all - except at the whim of a congressman/woman?
Remember when Carter leaked about the Stealth Bomber? I was outraged then - am now.
And if we're into no secrets - then why not let Rockefeller tell who is really behind him? I don't think you want to know. But you might want to do some in depth research.
20
posted on
12/12/2004 7:50:09 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
(...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson