Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

what gets me is this reliance on "exit polls" as if they were gospel. Could it be that some RATS actually woke up and voted for Bush? Could it be that the sample was flawed? NAAAAH, had to be Karl Rove just had to be.


7 posted on 12/12/2004 6:08:11 AM PST by StoneColdTaxHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StoneColdTaxHater
It's funny because they claimed that polls before election day underpolled support for Kerry because of all those cellphones that weren't being polled (Katrina Vanden Heuvel John Batchelor Show November 1st, 2004). Now they want us to believe that exit polls were more accurate than the actual vote. Kerry didn't do all that bad in Ohio. From 2000, the democratic candidate lost by 165,000 votes, this time only by 119,000. Statistical evidence shows that, if any, the fraud was committed by the Democrats.
22 posted on 12/12/2004 6:57:03 AM PST by Perdogg (W stands for Winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson