To: Jeff Head; John Jorsett; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; blam; TexKat
Here is some media bias:
The Marines and Army have almost 20,000 Humvees in Iraq, according to the Pentagon. But a quarter of the vehicles do not have proper armor.
What is proper armor for a vehicle that was designed as a replacement of a WW II light vehicle?
6 posted on
12/11/2004 10:30:18 AM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Proper Armor is an Abrams tank, or Bradley AFV.
23 posted on
12/11/2004 11:10:44 AM PST by
PokeyJoe
(Viva Bush)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
There probably isn't any proper armor...but you go to war with the stuff you got.....
37 posted on
12/11/2004 11:52:22 AM PST by
stuartcr
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"What is proper armor for a vehicle that was designed as a replacement of a WW II light vehicle?"Bingo! It's a JEEP, people!
Can you image WWII soldiers saying their Jeeps were not armored? That the canvas sides were not real effective against anything?
If a Humvee is not protecting its occupants, maybe that vehicle is not appropriate for that area. Maybe we should be using an M-1?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What is proper armor for a vehicle that was designed as a replacement of a WW II light vehicle? Well, in the case of my first car, a 1942 Jeep, the armor (above and beyond the steel in the body, which, compared to today's plasticars was substantial), consisted of at least twelve coats of paint and, in places, solder which was used to fill dents in the body.
63 posted on
12/11/2004 7:08:13 PM PST by
George Smiley
(The only 180 that Kerry hasn't done is the one that would release ALL his military records.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson