Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leadpenny; Fedora; Shermy
This tale eplains a lot about some past timed leak stories.

Also, check this out:

Shaw, 65, is a longtime government employee who served in the White House under Presidents Ford, Nixon and Reagan and was an associate deputy secretary in the Department of Commerce.

So, let me guess... we're supposed to believe that Shaw didn't serve under Carter, Bush Sr. and Clinton? Never served under Carter or Clinton in particular?

Reeks of the BS stories we were told that Wesley Clark was really a Republican, that former amb. Joe Wilson was nonpartisan and leaned pubbie, that Richard Clarke was a pubbie, etc. NOne of them were as advertised.

6 posted on 12/11/2004 8:40:48 AM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: piasa

I think the message "served in the White House" is to indicate he was closer to the executive branch at those times vs being in the Department of Commerce or the Department of Defense...

Nevertheless, I agree. The wording attempts to paint him as a long time Republican operative.


12 posted on 12/11/2004 9:04:01 AM PST by Prost1 (Postulating the Absurd does not make it legitimate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: piasa

What makes sense is Shaw "leaking" a story about the missing explosives to make Bush look like he's lost controls and under cut Putin, as the only world leader who came out for Bush.


17 posted on 12/11/2004 11:46:53 AM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson