To: OESY
OK, by their own admission it's not about statistics, it's not about who will succeed at the next level, and you can't win it if your not on a top-flight team. They forgot to mention that if you're a lineman or a defensive player you can forget it.
So what it boils down to is it's a media circus award for the running back, quarterback, or wide receiver who's athletic department can generate the most pre-vote publicity and "buzz".
This usually results in them selecting a glamor boy from a team with a weak schedule and few other quality players to handle the ball. This allows a team to run up the numbers on one guy. If you have a balanced offense and spread the ball among a number of players, you won't be seeing the "Heistman" at your school.
That's also why these pretty boys notorious fall flat when they finally get some competition in a bowl game or the NFL.
4 posted on
12/11/2004 7:27:35 AM PST by
BigBobber
To: BigBobber
The Heisman has really become a joke. Not to take anything away from Reggie Bush, but how does someone become a finalist when they do not even start or get a majority of the carries?
I am tired of ESPNs double standards and whining about what they themselves created.
To: BigBobber
I agree with everything you say.
I think the January, 2004 Sugar Bowl sealed White's fate. Unfortunately, he won't repeat.
7 posted on
12/11/2004 8:53:13 AM PST by
El Gran Salseron
(My wife just won the "Inmate of the Month Award!" :-))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson