[NittanyLion]

Apt word, 'nutshell'. -- Rockchucker is not supporting individual rights by arguing that defending our RKBA's somehow burdens 'others'.

Look, you're advancing a wrongheaded and foolish argument that has no merit. Of course the government dictating to a property owner the rules he may set on his own property is a burden; anyone who claims otherwise is disingenuous at best.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"Disingenuous" is jonesy's most consistent stance on this issue.

[jonestown]

Mans most primary right is to defend himself. -- Indeed, - the State is charged in our Constitution to prevent infringements on that individual right.


You claim that is a "wrongheaded and foolish argument that has no merit" yet you fail to counter argue the point.



The government is not 'dictating' to a property owner the rules he may set on his own property.
In this case, the legislature was correctly preventing companies from infringing on their employees right to carry arms to & from work.

Politicians were doing their Constitutional duty for a change.

"Anyone who claims otherwise is disingenuous at best" is simply another specious generality.

[spunkets]

" Of course the government dictating to a property owner the rules he may set on his own property is a burden; anyone who claims otherwise is disingenuous at best."

See #482.