To: jonestown
You've made it quite evident, - you disagree that our individual RKBA's does not apply to an employees vehicle in company provided parking. Double negatives aside, that's correct.
Thus, you've made it quite evident that you don't agree our RKBA's is an individual right.
This conclusion does not follow from your first statement. A refresher course in logic might be in order.
739 posted on
12/15/2004 10:11:36 AM PST by
Modernman
(Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
To: Modernman
jones:
You've made it quite evident, - you disagree that our individual RKBA's does not apply to an employees vehicle in company provided parking.
Thus, you've made it quite evident that you don't agree our RKBA's is an individual right.
Double negatives aside, that's correct.
This conclusion does not follow from your first statement. A refresher course in logic might be in order.
739 Modernman
The logic of my first line [with which you agree] buttresses the logic of the second. The conclusion stands as rational.
Your view of logic is flawed.
748 posted on
12/15/2004 12:41:35 PM PST by
jonestown
( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson