Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
You're off on a tangent. Police searches are completely different. They are based on Constituitonal, due process law applied to all equally. These are lawful firearms, not the equal of child porn. The justification for the rule is arbitrary, has no relation to the workplace and violates the employee's rights.

As I said before, the business relationship here makes the situation unique from any other arrangement.

733 posted on 12/15/2004 9:50:57 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets

He didn't go to jail, he was dismissed for knowingly violating workplace rules.

Note that the employer did nothing wrong, as evident by the fact that they weren't charged with anything.

In fact, the best proof that the employer was doing something not only legal, but within their rights, is the fact that in order to stop the employer from continuing to do what they were doing, the legislature had to make it illegal.

What does that mean?

It means that what was done WAS LEGAL IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD.


756 posted on 12/15/2004 2:25:13 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson