To: jonestown
It is against the clear 'public policy' of the 2nd Amendment to unreasonably require your employees to strip their vehicle of arms before parking in the lot provided them. You keep saying this, with no backup. Do you have any case law that would support this position, or are you just making an argument based on wishful thinking?
656 posted on
12/15/2004 7:38:52 AM PST by
Modernman
(Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
To: Modernman
Ole jones backs nothing up, you're arguing against his/her unchangeable, predisposed, non-grounded in law "logic".
People think that law is what they THINK it should be, not what it actually is.
660 posted on
12/15/2004 8:02:53 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Modernman
jones
It is against the clear 'public policy' of the 2nd Amendment to unreasonably require your employees to strip their vehicle of arms before parking in the lot provided them.
You keep saying this, with no backup. Do you have any case law that would support this position, or are you just making an argument based on wishful thinking?
656 Modernman
Why use "caselaw"?
The clear words of the 2nd support the peoples position. - Our rights to keep & bear arms shall not be infringed.
It's 'wishfull thinking' on your part to argue otherwise.
674 posted on
12/15/2004 8:16:19 AM PST by
jonestown
( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson