Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
If the company hadn't violated the employees property Rights by trying to exersize dominion over the employees private property, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

And 'round we go...

Actually, this is a great situational example for debate. Some of the best threads on this site are discussing conflicting rights, IMO. Particularly when the rights involved are historically conservative.

583 posted on 12/14/2004 11:59:25 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
I agree. At least when cooler heads seem to be prevailing.

As for conflicting Rights. I really don't see it that way. The Employer has his property. I, as employee, have mine. As long I as own that vehicle, what is inside it is my property. No matter where that vehicle sits, the contents are mine. No one elses.

If an employer says "No firearms on MY property", then fine. My guns will stay in my car. While on my employers property they will never pass the boundry of my property on to theirs unless such circumstances would save my life or the life of another. In which case, I would feel comfortable suffering any punishment for violating my employers property Rights.

Staying alive is my first priority though.

586 posted on 12/14/2004 12:08:54 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson