Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
" It seems to me that, if an employee consented to the search as part of the terms of employment, then no deprivation is occurring."

The economic concern makes it an extortion of employee rights per 18USC241.

" I understood the policy to be in part because guns in a locked car are readily retrievable "

They're just as retrievable as any kept at home, or in vehicles parked outside the gate. Criminals have already demonstrated that. Normal folks(gun owners) have already demonstated beyond a reasonable doubt, that they don't consider shooting folks at work valid, and don't do it either.

556 posted on 12/14/2004 9:32:53 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
The economic concern makes it an extortion of employee rights per 18USC241.

That seems like a bit of a stretch. IMHO you can't extort someone out of earning your own money.

They're just as retrievable as any kept at home, or in vehicles parked outside the gate. Criminals have already demonstrated that. Normal folks(gun owners) have already demonstated beyond a reasonable doubt, that they don't consider shooting folks at work valid, and don't do it either.

I would agree. That said, I suspect some would make the analogy to a waiting period; by the time you get home and retrieve the gun you've had time to cool down. (I don't agree with waiting periods either.)

558 posted on 12/14/2004 9:36:35 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson