Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion

Why argue for a "No Firearms in your cars policy"?

How does this type of 'policy' serve the Constitution?
jones






It doesn't. It serves the property owner's whim, which is all that's required.

Contrary to your false assertion upthread, private companies are not required to serve the Constitution in order to conduct commerce in the US.

531 NittanyLion






'Whims' trump our RKBA's? - Interesting concept.


Contrary to your false assertion that I made a "false assertion" upthread:
--- private companies are required to obey Constitutional law in order to conduct business in the US.


536 posted on 12/14/2004 8:49:17 AM PST by jonestown ( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]


To: jonestown
'Whims' trump our RKBA's? - Interesting concept.

On someone else's property, they do.

By the way, when can I come exercise my First Amendment rights in your front yard? I notice you conveniently dropped that subject.

Contrary to your false assertion that I made a "false assertion" upthread: --- private companies are required to obey Constitutional law in order to conduct business in the US.

Yet countless other companies have similar policies in effect - and are continuing to do business in the US. If your assertion was fact, the OK legislature would've simply shut down Weyerhauser instead of passing this law, no?

Thounsands of companies are proving you wrong everday. The fact that you refuse to admit it, doesn't change the truth of my statement.

541 posted on 12/14/2004 9:00:23 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson