Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

It's illegal to violate the right of a property owner to set conditions on access and use of their property, but you seem to think that it is OK to violate that legality, why would a few more violations mean anything to you?


514 posted on 12/14/2004 7:56:33 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
It is no more OK to violate the business owners private property Rights as it is to violate the employees private property Rights. How many different ways do I have to say it before you get it through that skull of yours?

My firearms stay in my car. If I so much as stick one out the window while parked in their parking lot I have violated their property Rights. But not until.

Get it? Or does your hatred of firearms blind you to so simple a fact?

522 posted on 12/14/2004 8:03:43 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I googled the topic and got some more info here (bottom of the page):

This law was written by our local congressman because of a couple of incidences here in S.E. Oklahoma. The Weyerhauser company did a surprise drug check on the employees vehicles in the parking lot (on company property). The dog hit on a pickup truck. When it was searched, they did not find drugs, they did find wintergreen chewing tobacco which the dog was convinced was drugs. However, they also found an unloaded rifle behind the seat. The employee was fired. Then, a couple of weeks later, they did a surprise search of every vehicle on the lot. Several of them had guns in them. All of the employees with guns in their vehicles were fired. Most of them had been with the company SEVERAL years. They anounced that they would conduct random searched daily. All hell broke loose & the employees started parking along side the highway in the bar ditch (off company property) in protest. The law, as written, would allow employees fired for having a gun in their vehicle to sue to get their job back & back pay. James

Although it's just an anonymous poster, it sounds as though employees are exercising the right to park off-property.

539 posted on 12/14/2004 8:56:43 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson