Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga
Then you should have no objection to getting to the law changed to add firearms ownership/possession to the gender/race etc.

If gun owners become a legally-protected class, then private employers would have to respect that.

I'm not trying to argue that this company's actions were smart or moral; rather, that they were entitled to be stupid based upon property rights and the employment agreement.

485 posted on 12/14/2004 7:12:42 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
Not to belabor the point, but how much more protected do gun owners need to be?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Now what we need is more people adherring to it instead of ignoring it out right.

489 posted on 12/14/2004 7:15:57 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson