To: Squantos
Ok at least I have established yer knowledge on the subject at hand....sorry to bother.It's a good thing we "gun loonys" have defended "ridiculous ideas" or BOOTSTICK would be left to defending himself with a stick.
That he carries in his boot.
Unless, of course, Luis Gonzales declared even that self-defense to be unconstitutional.
469 posted on
12/14/2004 6:12:55 AM PST by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: Lazamataz
"...Luis Gonzales declared even that self-defense to be unconstitutional."Where exactly did I say that Laz?
How does my (correctly) stating that self defense is not a Constitutional right equate to me saying that self-defense is unconstitutional?
I'm truly surprised at where you're going here.
475 posted on
12/14/2004 6:49:35 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Lazamataz; BOOTSTICK; Luis Gonzales
It's a good thing we "gun loonys" have defended "ridiculous ideas" or BOOTSTICK would be left to defending himself with a stick.
That he carries in his boot.
Unless, of course, Luis Gonzales declared even that self-defense to be unconstitutional.
469 Lazamataz
One wonders what these 'defenders of property' would say if their government regulated insurance companies told them to disarm themselves or lose all coverages.
-- I suspect they would applaud the new program as a great step foward in community safety.
480 posted on
12/14/2004 7:01:22 AM PST by
jonestown
( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson