To: jonestown
You've been asked, on more than several ocassions, to prove these claims that you continue to make about employee parking...yet you never do.
Unsubstantiated claims carry absolutely no weight, and neither does your argument.
420 posted on
12/13/2004 7:17:18 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Yes, [as you said] Weyerhouser acted like gigantic a$$holes firing such long-term employees.
And they are, in effect, violating the employees Constitutional right to keep & bear arms [while going to & from work] in doing so.
The Oklahoma State Legislature agrees.
395 jones
The law will not stand, because property rights supersede the idea that the employee is entitled to a job, a parking spot on someone else's property, and the right to dictate what rules he wishes to disregard in relation to another person's property.
399 Luis
No one here, or in Oklahoma, has the idea that the employee is entitled to a job, or a parking spot on someone else's property.
The simple facts of the issue are that employers are required by local government to provide employee parking, and the employees seldom have any option but to use it.
Thus, if arms are prohibited in the lot, the employees RKBA's is being infringed.
409 jonestown
You've been asked, on more than several ocassions, to prove these claims that you continue to make about employee parking...yet you never do.
Unsubstantiated claims carry absolutely no weight, and neither does your argument.
420 Luis
You've been asked, on more than one occasion, to prove these claims that you continue to make, -- that employees lose their RKBA's in the company parking lot...yet you never do.
Unsubstantiated claims carry absolutely no weight, and neither does your argument.
428 posted on
12/13/2004 7:55:58 PM PST by
jonestown
( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson