To: Chemist_Geek
"Criminal attack is not a reasonably foreseeable incident, nor is possession of a firearm a sufficiently likely guarantor of harm prevention."
Are you saying that I as an officer am not safer with a gun? And if attack is not reasonably foreseeable I should not be carrying a gun?
I think my post #349 applies to you quite well.
To: MontanaCowgirlCop
Er... 349 was mine. Did you perchance mean 338?
361 posted on
12/13/2004 12:11:24 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson