Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BOOTSTICK
Yes I'm afraid any person who thinks he has a "right" to be armed on my preoperty is indeed a LOONY!!!!!!!!

And I think anyone who thinks he can deny a constitutional right because he owns a piece of land is a loony.

Case-in-point: By your logic, you could own slaves because that little bit of land is deeded to you.

You might deny someone the right to be on your land outright, but after you have granted someone the right to be on your land, the constitution pertains.

284 posted on 12/13/2004 8:33:38 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz
The concept of preventing armed folk in private businesses has been around pre Constitution, and post Constitution, and only since the 13th amend was passed A private owner could have slaves. You need to understand the concept of private property "COMRADE"
294 posted on 12/13/2004 8:41:30 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Oh and Lazamataz, try exercising your first amendment rights on my property, come onto my property with a soap box, and begin to tell all of your opinions, then watch how fast I have local law enforcement legally remove you from MY property! Again the founding fathers never intended people to be armed wherever they please {saloons , courthouses, churches}
301 posted on 12/13/2004 8:48:38 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson