Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimthewiz

Where did I say that a Federal Courthouse searched cars?

That however, doesn't mean that an employer can't stipulate that as a condition of employment, does it?

If you don't like the employer's workplace rules then your choices are either to park someplace other than the employer's private property (his parking lot), or work elsewhere.

It's really this simple: you are not entitled to dictate what rules a property owner can set as a condition of access to their private property, your choice is to either accept those conditions or not, if you don't, then you don't have access to the property.

You can't tell a property owner that you refuse to abide by his wishes, and enter his property...that's called trespassing.


233 posted on 12/13/2004 5:03:47 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez

It's really this simple: you are not entitled to dictate what rules a property owner can set as a condition of access to their private property, your choice is to either accept those conditions or not, if you don't, then you don't have access to the property.
233 Luis Gonzalez







It's really this simple: you are not entitled to dictate rules that in effect disarm your employees. People have the right to carry arms to & from work.
Thus, your choice is to either accept those Constitutional conditions or not, if you don't, then you won't be able to conduct business in the USA.


236 posted on 12/13/2004 6:58:37 AM PST by jonestown ( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson