[Batrachian]

Issuing a blanket statement forbidding guns on a property is neither search nor seizure. Again, the individual is not required to enter the property. It's his choice, but if he chooses to do so then he has to abide by the owner's requirements.

[jonestown]

Issuing a blanket statement forbidding guns on a property is neither search nor seizure. Again, the individual is not required to enter the property.

225 Batrachian

---

In the cases at issue, employees are required to use company parking lots while on the job.

Forbidding guns on such a basis is an infringement on their right to carry arms to & from work.

[jimthewiz]

Issuing a blanket statment is not the issue.He was not fired because of a blanket statement.

Searching vehicles without probable cause is the issue.
He was fired after they searched his vehicle and found a gun.

Private property rights do not relieve the owner of PC (probable cause) before searching.
They could deny access if one refused to allow the search, but they must have probable cause to search without your permission.

The US Constitution and the laws of all 50 states support this.