The Second Amendment doesn't come at the expense of other rights.
Well glad to see somebody would agree with King George. His right to divine rule on British Sovereign Property and Territories, certainly gave him the right to confiscate the arms of the subjects...
Of course the minutemen fired on the brits at concorde... the shot heard round the world. They were coming to remove the weapons from the King's sovereign territory and property... and it marked the beginning of the end... of the british empire...
All corporate property rights END where your inalienable rights as an individual begin. And for what it's worth, corporate rights are NOT even recognized as inalienable, or guaranteed in the constitution, whereas INDIVIDUAL rights are in both cases. In most state laws and constitutions, corporate property rights do not supercede nor are they recognized to be ABOVE those of indivuduals.
and the corporation, along with other businesses who routinely violate their employees' rights (allegedly in a voluntary fashion) are finding this out.
GOOD.
I hope they either learn to obey the law, or are put out of business by others who are willing to obey the constitution and refrain from trying to alienate, what is KNOWN to be inalienable.
Run the violators out of business... their right to exist as a corporation is dependent in codified law, on their subservience to and support of constitutional laws of the states and federal government. It is a requirement by law, of their official corporate charter or they would not be allowed to corporate in the first place
compared to individuals, constitutionally, corporations have virtually NO guaranteed rights... and all of the ones they DO have, are granted by statute, not by the constitution.
Seldom is an armed employee.... killed by a firearm. Sidearms of some kind should be the norm, not the exception.
as muslim terror continues and expands... they will be.
In most state laws and constitutions, corporate property rights do not supercede nor are they recognized to be ABOVE those of indivuduals. I find it ironic and humorous that some folks here are arguing that 1) the "rights" of something created by man (a corporation) trump the Rights of the creator (man); and 2) that the state has no moral authority to regulate an entity which exists solely because of corporate charter laws that the state passed.
Of course, it ceases being humorous when you realize that many Americans have been fired by those statist HR bastards for exercising the RKBA, or murdered at the "gun-free" workplace by a lunatic.
or are put out of business by others who are willing to obey the constitution and refrain from trying to alienate, what is KNOWN to be inalienable.
Easier said than done. I suspect that many of these anti-gun kompanies are somehow getting supported by the feds. (In a truly "free market", these kompanies would have neither the time nor the resources to waste on soviet-style witch hunts.)
and the corporation, along with other businesses who routinely violate their employees' rights (allegedly in a voluntary fashion) are finding this out.
AOL tried this crap in Utah when they fired some workers for keeping weapons in their cars. They were caught by some donut-munching Nazi watching the zecurity cameras. I think they might have even been off company property (in an adjacent parking lot) when they were caught by Adolf Jr.
Anyway, the Utah legislature responded by passing a law making these kompanies legally and financially responsible if employees are harmed as a result of disarming them.
They have the right idea, since the only thing those korporate beancounters seem to understand is money and power. Hit them where it hurts.