Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Batrachian
I think private property rights have to come first. The Second Amendment doesn't come at the expense of other rights.

I agree (but)... ;)

This is a continuation of the multiple laws driven by those on the left that infringe on the rights of property owners. The ban on smoking in restaurants and bars passed in many cities is the closest example. We have given up something to allow for what has been determined to be an overriding right, clean air and health.

That I didn't agree with them, and spoke/voted against it is no longer the point. The laws have been upheld and complaining about them is pointless. They ARE. Deal with it.

So now it's the same thing, but those on the political left are those being asked to modify property rights to allow a greater need, the right to self defense, to prevail. This time I agree and think that the needs of individuals to the right of self defense should override property.

104 posted on 12/11/2004 11:30:15 AM PST by kAcknor (That's my version of it anyway....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: kAcknor
"...the right to self defense..."

There is no Constitutional right to self defense.

207 posted on 12/12/2004 1:39:49 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson