Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun owners claim right to take their rifles to work
Telegraph ^ | 11/12/04 | Alec Russell in Valliant and Scott Heiser in Washington

Posted on 12/11/2004 6:07:04 AM PST by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 841-856 next last
To: BOOTSTICK
No I am using every common sense argument to assure Property owners can dictate that armed people not be permitted on their property.

'Common sense arguments'. Hmmm. Where have I heard that phrase before.

OH YEAH! I remember. 'Common sense gun control'!!


Say goodnight, Sarah.

281 posted on 12/13/2004 8:30:52 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: MontanaCowgirlCop

Dear MontanaCowgirlCop,

"So could my boss say that I own a pickup and they are gas-guzzlers and so therefore I may not park it there?"

I believe that foreign-made vehicles were prohibited from the parking lots of certain American automakers for a time.

If you live in a state with a strong at-will employment doctrine, your employer could forbid you from wearing red to work, or from wearing long hair and earrings (if you're a man). Unless it can be interpreted by a judge that your employer has violated the protections of the law for race, religion, color of skin, gender, or nationality of origin.


sitetest


sitetest


282 posted on 12/13/2004 8:32:18 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Right, go to your local federal court house and walk in armed, then post me again from your jail cell. Now grow up!


283 posted on 12/13/2004 8:32:36 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Yes I'm afraid any person who thinks he has a "right" to be armed on my preoperty is indeed a LOONY!!!!!!!!

And I think anyone who thinks he can deny a constitutional right because he owns a piece of land is a loony.

Case-in-point: By your logic, you could own slaves because that little bit of land is deeded to you.

You might deny someone the right to be on your land outright, but after you have granted someone the right to be on your land, the constitution pertains.

284 posted on 12/13/2004 8:33:38 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

Which is the crime that he will land in jail for? The carrying the gun, trespassing, or shooting you? Carrying the gun does not equal shooting.


285 posted on 12/13/2004 8:34:35 AM PST by FreedomHasACost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

Once again when defeated with the facts and common sense the yahoos cry "gun grabber" ;LOL


286 posted on 12/13/2004 8:34:51 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

Dear BOOTSTICK,

"Correct, try to enter a nuclear power plant with a weapon in your vehicle, oh and if one is found , don't expect to be asked to leave the premisis, expect a trip to the pokey with smokey!"

Oh, heck, that's if you're lucky.


sitetest


287 posted on 12/13/2004 8:35:01 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Right, go to your local federal court house and walk in armed, then post me again from your jail cell.

I can agree with court-restrictions on firearms. That is the only restriction I can agree with, and only because justice is being meted out there.

Now grow up!

What a ween.

288 posted on 12/13/2004 8:35:06 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

If the boot fits...


289 posted on 12/13/2004 8:35:25 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
Once again when defeated with the facts and common sense

Give me a holler if you ever emit any, 'kay?

290 posted on 12/13/2004 8:35:50 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK

Where's the common sense in banning guns from locked cars?
262 jones




A locked car is only locked until a pissed off or unstable employee goes out and unlocks it. Hope this isn't too confusing for you.
265





Not confusing at all. Common sense tells me you will use any excuse to justify disarming employees.
268 jones




Correct as a business owner I will indeed use any excuse to disarm employees, since I have decided only myself and my employees who are also my relations may be armed on my property.
It all boils down to the yahoos and gun slingers who think that since they went through all that trouble of procuring a CCW, they should have carte blanc to carry wherever they wish......gee too bad. Since I have no clue of the level of training an employee , or patron that has a CCW , and since many CCW courses are a laughable joke, I will not permit armed folk on my property, unless they are my relatives.
272






Fine, you explained your attitude about yahoos & gunslingers.

Where's the common sense in banning guns from locked cars?



291 posted on 12/13/2004 8:36:11 AM PST by jonestown ( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: jonestown

bttt


292 posted on 12/13/2004 8:37:48 AM PST by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

See 274.


293 posted on 12/13/2004 8:39:27 AM PST by jonestown ( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The concept of preventing armed folk in private businesses has been around pre Constitution, and post Constitution, and only since the 13th amend was passed A private owner could have slaves. You need to understand the concept of private property "COMRADE"
294 posted on 12/13/2004 8:41:30 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: jonestown

Dera jonestown,

1. My name isn't "Sarah." ;-)

2. I haven't offered much of an opinion as to what ought to be, only what is.

3. It's too bad that you can't carry on a civil dialogue with someone with whom you disagree without literally name-calling.


sitetest


295 posted on 12/13/2004 8:42:57 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Dera = Dear.


296 posted on 12/13/2004 8:43:30 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Having a gun in a locked car is not my employer's business. Now, if I carry it on my person into the office, that's a different issue.


297 posted on 12/13/2004 8:43:50 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
As do you. The business owners property STOPS at the tarmac. From the rubber on up is MY private property.

Your fear of law abiding citizens carrying around firearms may be a symptom of a pathological paranoia. I suggest consulting your Yellow Pages for psychiatric help.

298 posted on 12/13/2004 8:44:32 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: jonestown

SEE 265


299 posted on 12/13/2004 8:44:41 AM PST by BOOTSTICK (MEET ME IN KANSAS CITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: BOOTSTICK
"No power trip, just common sense."

Your example shows a valid reason why an employer would have interest in after hours activities of an employee - when it has a direct impact on the employer. But in many cases, employers have gone way too far.

300 posted on 12/13/2004 8:47:29 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 841-856 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson