If there's no place for religion in government, why should there be a place for art? Why is government money used to give one person access to speech above another?
Posted on 12/10/2004 12:30:48 PM PST by SmithL
San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Matt Gonzalez, who has thumbed his nose at the establishment before, let a graffiti artist spray paint his City Hall office walls with the bright orange message: "SMASH THE STATE."
There is irony. There is art appreciation. There are raised eyebrows.
Gonzalez, who has hosted monthly art installations in his office by unknown and known artists for the last four years, offered up this graffiti for one of his last exhibits before he exits City Hall on Jan. 8. Gonzalez did not seek re-election.
The timing and placement of the artwork are interesting, seeing how City Hall is a registered historical landmark, and you need approval just to hang a bulletin board -- and seeing how Mayor Gavin Newsom, Gonzalez's rival in the mayor's race last year, has been issuing strict edicts about the city's and public's responsibility to clean up graffiti vandalism.
The artist's message in traffic-cone orange that appears behind Gonzalez's desk was painted by Barry McGee, an internationally known San Francisco artist whose work first appeared anonymously in the 1980s on outdoor walls and tunnels.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
So this is what he's paid to do?
Seems like they created a climate of hate to me. Where are the PC police?
Cosidering that the "state" in question is California, not a bad sentiment.
If there's no place for religion in government, why should there be a place for art? Why is government money used to give one person access to speech above another?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.