Replies

Ah name calling the last vestige of the genius mind.

You made a statement about me that was demonstratably false.

I don't see how that doesn't make you a liar.

Then you are a liar for saying that I said that Flew accepted Christ,

Except that I didn't say that you said this. You said that any who accept Christ is welcomed into the family. I, correctly, pointed out that the subject of the article had not accepted Christ. Your statment implied that you were either misinformed about Flew's conversion or you understood the nature of Flew's change of heart, but threw in a non-sequitur for no reason. My response was tailored to fit that uncertainty. As such, I never made any specific claims about your statement then.

If you do not have a problem with God why do you protest so much?

Would you protest if someone lied about things that you have said? How about if someone expressed a desire to see you suffer (ie, how you wanted to see me stand before God and watch me say that my IQ said that He didn't exist, thus assuming that my atheism is a result of me thinking that I'm smarter than you -- another arrogant, false assumption)

If becoming a Christian means becoming as malicious, spiteful and dishonest as you, then I want nothing to do with your rleigion.