Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Miller was very circumspect and explained her protection of source rule is if the source has been honest.

Did she explain that the investigation is about more than who first told reporters about Plame?

12 posted on 12/09/2004 4:44:15 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy

Hello Shermy...I was going to ping you. Judith Miller would not discuss any details whatsoever to do with the grand jury.

She described her philosophy in general about reporters and their sources. She did say she does believe a source waives confidentiality when they've been dishonest with the reporter and she would not cover up a crime.

I came away with my working theory in tact that Miller is more of a witness to the newsgathering angle and not a participant in any skullduggery.


14 posted on 12/09/2004 4:52:00 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson