Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle
Reporters should not be making promises to sources which are contrary to law.

While I have no sympathy whatsoever for Barry Bonds, I am concerned that the grand jury testimony was illegally obtained and there seems to be no interest in who committed that crime.

11 posted on 12/09/2004 4:42:15 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: bushisdamanin04
Reporters should not be making promises to sources which are contrary to law.
The First Amendment doesn't say that reporters are special, it says that whoever who wants to can be a reporter if they can pay for their paper and ink. Now as the Internet competes with print, virtual "paper and ink" is virtually free.

There is no justification for assigning special rights to people because they are doing something (reporting) that anyone is entitled to do. It is elitism to do so for the NY Times reporter and not for the Free Repubic poster.


15 posted on 12/09/2004 5:03:44 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson