Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
It's not my theory.

Yes, apparently, unless you qualify it, it is.

Most competent economists agree with Adam Smith's EXCEPTION to Free Trade: National Defense. And while some libertarians say they also do, in fact, it is more often lip service. They never seem to see the connections between core industries and defense.

The slave is not getting rich either. And that is deliberate. The LAST thing these communist overlords want is for a REAL capitalist middle-class to take off. You are apparently unaware of the master here in this 'trade' relationship. It is the PRC/PLA.

225 posted on 12/12/2004 6:11:45 PM PST by Paul Ross (Proud Member Pajamahadeen: Outing traitors, fifth columnists and appeasers until the cows come home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross

"EXCEPTION to Free Trade: National Defense."

We are talking armor plate here. Armor plate is defense. We do not contract the production of armor plate to China. Therefor any problem with the production of armor plate is not a result of our trade policies.


228 posted on 12/12/2004 6:56:03 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson