[churchillbuff]

I don't see the controversy."""

Did the reporter also manufacture all the cheering from the other troops when the question was asked? Clearly, this armament problem is on the minds of these troops. Rush and other Rumsfeld apologists want to change the subject. They don't support the troops, they support Rumsfeld and whatever steps or missteps he makes.

[TheForceOfOne]

You miss the point. We don't mind debating, spending more money, or whatever for the troops we do not trust the media or their motives. The MSM DOES NOT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE TROOPS ONLY THE DESTRUCTION OF BUSH!!!! understand now?

[Americanwolf]

Read post 625.. I read the transcirpt and that was the only reference that i found in regards to cheering after the armored humvee question.

[Feiny]

I agree. I have no problem with the reporter getting the soldier to ask the question. I did not like the answers Rumsfeld gave either. I like Rumsfeld, but he attempted to make excuses. There is absolutley no reason why our troops should be going through piles of garbage looking for scrap metal to protect themselves (although, this should make liberals happy as the military is recycling). There are billions being spent on this war & those vehicles should be fully armored & all troops should have kevlar vests.

[nopardons]

Hmmmmmmmmm...unlike YOU,who is just oh so "patriotic",even though you post every single anti-Bush,anti-Rummy,anti-WoT,anti-Iraq,anti-military thing you can lay your grubby,LIBERAL hands on/

Look Neville,we all know exactly who you are and where you're coming from.Even Murray Mom hasn't posted as many anti-GOP/Conservative threads and replies as you have.