Do you not understand the concept of "Military Bearing" and "Professionalism"?
During the Clinton Administration, if I'd addressed the SecDef the way that Spec4 did, I'd have been busted down so fast my head would've spun.
Do you also not understand that the reporter BRAGGED ABOUT PLANTING THE QUESTION?
Look at the way it was framed.
Look at the fact that it was PLANTED.
Oh yeah, you don't CARE about fact.
You've already proven that much.
I wish I had pictures for you because you don't seem to understand written words and you cannot stay on focus.
You, too, are more interested in the motives and the delivery of the question than getting the results. That seems pretty dam clear.
I keep saying that the troops need the best, that they don't feel they are getting it, and I'm getting a lot of argument from you and a small group.
Why? Why are you more interested in the motive of the question and the delivery than getting the problems solved?
Why is it that you will expend a great deal of energy trying to dismiss the question rather than solve the problems that inspired the question?
Sorry, I must go, it is late.