#326 is pretty close to the truth from the reports I read.
But I guess that if you can't rebut well you can always slander.
The questions were admittedly staged by the reporter from the Chattanooga Free Press, not the Bush administration. Is that enough of a rebuttal to suit you?
The guy was reading the question from a piece of paper.
The reporter sent a memo to his bosses bragging about setting it up.
But facts don't matter when you want to slam those in uniform, or just a convient target like Rumsfeld.
;-)