Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye
Read a few dozen responses...see the tone and the underlying theme of 'how could they do this to Rumsfeld'.

I haven't read all the repsonses, but the leftist reporter was crowing about his little ruse to try to embarass Rumsfeld.

I have no problem with a soldier asking the Sec. Of Defense a question, even a hard hitting one.

I do have a problem with that soldier being coached by a reporter with an agenda, and that agenda, IMO, is to defeat American objectives.

1,105 posted on 12/10/2004 5:52:31 AM PST by Dane (Trial lawyers are the tapeworms to wealth creating society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1103 | View Replies ]


To: Dane

Well said.


1,107 posted on 12/10/2004 6:00:51 AM PST by bonny011765
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies ]

To: Dane

I understand your thought on that perfectly.

I've been over here for nearly two years and don't keep up with the news well except on FR so I don't know who these reporters are and what their motives are.

Frankly there are many other questions that could and should be asked and answered. I have no problem with someone putting Rumsfeld on the spot.

Maybe some of it is that we are looking from different sides of the glass.

Like I said, I understand your point of view. Mine is a bit different. It could be that I'm biased against the HUMVEE anyway, armored or not.


1,112 posted on 12/10/2004 6:23:31 AM PST by Eagle Eye (Some say the glass is half empty; some it's half full. I say, "Are you going to finish that?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson