[Dataman]

Because, as I've said before, who is better qualified to criticially examine the flaws of a biological theory than a lawyer?

That's one way to deal with the endless questions that naturalism can't answer: Allow only "qualified" people to ask them. But it really doesn't matter if a 6th grader asks the question or microbiologist does because naturalism still can't answer.

[Dimensio]

That's one way to deal with the endless questions that naturalism can't answer: Allow only "qualified" people to ask them

Well, it does get a bit frustrating when we have people with no training in the field asking irrelevant questions, such as "how can evolution be true when it can't explain the ultimate origin of life", despite the fact that it has been explained to that person over and over again that the theory of evolution does not and never has addressed the ultimate origin of life.

Anyone is allowed to ask questions about biology, but when we have people who have no understanding of the field proclaiming themselves 'experts' on why a leading theory is false, then demonstrating a fundamental lack of understanding of the field in general -- much less the theory -- it becomes a waste of time listening to them.

But, then, you knew that. You're just dishonestly trying to distract from the real issue.