[calex59]

Science has always been proven wrong by other scientists. It has been so down through the centuries. ID has not been disproven. Darwinism has been disproven. From Darwinism we went to neo-darwinism then to the latest "puntucated equilibrim" or the "hopeful monster" theory. I am not religious but I do not accept evolution because of the many holes in it. No transitional forms. Cambrian explosian and on and on. Until these questions have been answered I will continue to question todays scientists. Science is not perfect and has often been proven wrong. Explain to me how life started from nothing. Leave evolution out of it and tell me how it started, with proof, not conjecture or telling me that "suddenly there was life" as many evolutionists state. They also say things like, suddenly, like magic life was there! Ok, those are not quite the scientific facts I am looking for. Explain lifes start please with proof, not conjecture.

[Right Wing Professor]

Evolution is not a theory of life's origin.

[Dimensio]

ID has not been disproven.

What, exactly, would disprove it?

Darwinism has been disproven.

How, exactly, has it been disproven? Be specific.

No transitional forms. Cambrian explosian and on and on.

Ah, the common creationist objections made in spite of the fact that they're not problems for evolution at all. There are transitional forms, evolution-bashers just refuse to accept it, and there's no complication whatsoever with the Cambrian explosion despite the rantings of many creationists.

Explain to me how life started from nothing. Explain to me how life started from nothing.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with the theory of evolution.

[WildTurkey]

ID has not been disproven.

Neither has it been proven.

[crail]

tell me how it started, with proof, not conjecture
Well no one can do that because science doesn't have all the answers yet, or probably ever. Science is the quest for the answers and that quest is unfinished. However if you want an interesting conjecture without proof, check out Stuart Kauffman, "At home in the universe." Basically he shows that a in a large number of chemicals there is a very large number of possible reactants which produce a very large number of complex molecules, many very similar to organic molecules that form living organisms. He shows it theoretically and backs it up with experimental results using elements likely to be found on the early earth. Plus he's a pretty good popular science writer.

[WildTurkey]

Explain to me how life started from nothing. Leave evolution out of it and tell me how it started, with proof, not conjecture or telling me that "suddenly there was life" as many evolutionists state.

Explain to me how gravity works ...

[Oztrich Boy]

ID has not been disproven

So, how could it be disproven?

[Condorman]

Until these questions have been answered I will continue to question todays scientists.

If you are truly interested in science, question away. Be mindful, however, that the onus is upon you to listen to the answers.

start please with proof, not conjecture.

Science cannot offer you proof. Not of evolution, not of cell theory, not of atomic theory, not of gravitational theory. Will you accept evidence, instead?